Prospective Teachers’ Learning and Practicing Assessment in Teaching Practicum: Comparative Perspective in Pre-Service Teacher Education Programmes

Authors

  • Malik Ghulam Behlol Fatima Jinnah Women University, Rawalpindi, Pakistan
  • Alison Fox University of Leicester, UK
  • Faiza Massud Fatima Jinnah Women University Rawalpindi, Pakistan
  • Sahiba Arshad Fatima Jinnah Women University,Rawalpindi, Pakistan.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59926/jodprp.vol07/06%20

Keywords:

Teaching Practicum, Assessment, Pre-Service Teacher Education, Theory-Practice Gap

Abstract

This study examines the challenges associated with implementing learning-supportive assessment during teaching practicum, while also exploring the roles of University Tutors (UT), Cooperative Teachers (CT), Prospective Teachers (PT), and Heads of Practicum Schools (HPS) in selected universities in Pakistan and the United Kingdom (UK). Using the qualitative case study approach, data was collected through lesson observations of UT in pre-service teacher education settings and PT in practicum schools. Additionally, interviews were conducted with UT and HPS, and a Focus Group Discussion (FGD) was held with PT. The study concludes that, in comparison to their UK counterparts, PT in Pakistan encounter significant barriers to implementing learning-supportive assessment in practicum school settings. These barriers include large class sizes, a lack of institutionalised collaboration between universities and schools, inadequate lesson modelling, ineffective feedback practices, assignments that emphasise lower-order thinking skills, and limited opportunities to utilise technology in school settings. Based on the findings, the study recommends the implementation of a new assessment policy that expands examinations beyond mere knowledge recall to include competency assessment. This policy should incorporate adherence to Pakistani teacher standards and the use of reflective portfolios. Moreover, it is advised to provide training for UT and CT in enacting assessment techniques rather than solely providing theoretical knowledge. Additionally, the study proposes the development of problem-solving assignments or projects that require PT to engage in reflection, critical thinking, imagination, and multidimensional contributions.

JEL Classification Code: I20

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Author Biography

Malik Ghulam Behlol, Fatima Jinnah Women University, Rawalpindi, Pakistan

 

 

References

Anderson, L.W. and Krathwohl, D.R. (eds.) 2001, A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching, and Assessing: A Revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy of Educational Objectives, New York: Longman.

Arnold, J. and Mundy, B. 2020, ‘Praxis Pedagogy in Teacher Education’, Smart Learning Environments, vol. 7, pp 1-14, <https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-020-0116-z>.

Ayalon, M. and Wilkie, K. 2020, ‘Developing Assessment Literacy through Approximations of Practice: Exploring Secondary Mathematics Pre-Service Teachers Developing Criteria for a Rich Quadratics Task’, Teaching and Teacher Education, vol. 89, pp.1-14, <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2019.103011>.

Bashir, M. 2002, ‘A Study of Examination System of Pakistan and Development of a Model for Twenty-First Century’, Doctoral Dissertation, PMAS-Arid Agriculture University, Rawalpindi.

Behlol, G.M. and Cajkler, W. 2018, ‘Practices, Challenges and Implications of Teaching and Assessment of Cognitive Skills in Higher Education’, Pakistan Journal of Education, vol. 35, no. 1, pp.113-140.

Burke, M.K. and Fanshawe, M. 2021, ‘The Value of Praxis-Based Assessment to Stimulate Practical Engagement and Classroom Readiness in Online Initial Teacher

Education’, Australian Journal of Teacher Education, vol. 46, no. 10, pp. 91-109.

Chohan, B.I. and Shiekh, M.A. 2019, ‘Teachers’ Perspectives and Challenges in Assessment of Revised Teachers’ Training Programs’, Journal of Gender and Social Issues, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 99-109.

Creswell, J.W. and Clark, V.L.P. 2007, Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research, Sage Publications.

Gogus, A. 2012, ‘Active Learning’, in Encyclopaedia of the Sciences of Learning, N.M. Seel (ed.), Springer: Boston, <https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-1428-6_489>.

GoP 2009, National Professional Teacher Standards, Policy and Planning Wing, Ministry of Education, Government of Pakistan.

Harris, L.R., Brown, G.T.L. and Dargursh, J. 2018, ‘Not Playing the Game: Student Assessment Resistance as a Form of Agency’, The Australian Educational Researcher, vol. 45, no.1, pp. 125-140, <https://doi.org/10.1007/s13384-018-0264-0>.

Masood, F. and Behlol, G. 2020, ‘Re-Envisaging Teaching Practicum: Factors of School-University Partnership’, International Journal of Psychosocial Rehabilitation, vol. 24, no. 4, pp.1475-7192.

Naeemullah, K., Muhammad, I. H., Muhammad, S., Uddin, M. N., and Shafqat, H. 2010, ‘The Managerial Behavior of Secondary School Heads in Punjab (Pakistan)’, Educational Research and Reviews, vol. 5, no.4, pp.189-192.

Patton, M.Q. 1999, ‘Enhancing the Quality and Credibility of Qualitative Analysis’, Health Services Research, vol. 34, no. 5, pp. 1189-1208.

Sweller, J. 2009, ‘Cognitive Bases of Human Creativity’, Educational Psychology Review, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 11–19.

Published

2024-01-02

How to Cite

Ghulam Behlol, M., Fox, A., Massud, F., & Arshad, S. (2024). Prospective Teachers’ Learning and Practicing Assessment in Teaching Practicum: Comparative Perspective in Pre-Service Teacher Education Programmes. Journal of Development Policy, Research & Practice, 7(1), 122–140. https://doi.org/10.59926/jodprp.vol07/06