Gender Beliefs and Action Tendencies for Women’s Rights: Impact of National vis-à-vis International Policy Recommendations
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59926/jodprp.vol01/02Keywords:
Women’s rights, CEDAW, gender equality, gender beliefs, international policies, gender policies in PakistanAbstract
In most democratic developing countries, including Pakistan, a crucial and still least prioritised domain is reforms in the status of women’s rights. As reflected in the rankings provided by The Gender Gap Index Report (World Economic Forum 2016), Pakistan stands second from the bottom among 144 countries. There are many organisations and programmes at the international and national level that are trying to influence the challenged countries to improve women’s rights policies and practices including the United Nations’ Convention on the Elimination of all forms of Discrimination Against Women (CEDAW); Pakistan’s commitment to meeting the 17 Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs); and, the National Commission on the Status of Women (NCSW). The impact of national and international endorsement of the policies intended to improve women’s rights in Pakistan was explored in this survey. The survey was designed to see under which conditions, respondents would support policies focusing on women’s rights. The two conditions in the experiment were framed as such that the proposed reforms came from the National Government (national condition) or by the United Nations (international condition). As a comparative baseline, a control condition was added in which the source of proposals was not mentioned (control condition). The survey was conducted with 619 university students (males: 51%; females: 49 %). Data was collected from the students of the Quaid-i-Azam University, Islamabad; and, the Pakistan Institute of Development Economics, Islamabad, from March through August 2016.
Results of the study indicated that compared to the control condition, the respondents in the national and international condition expressed higher support for policy reforms for women’s rights. Furthermore, participants in the national and international condition were more likely to offer help in the implementation of these policy reforms. At the policy level, the survey supported the claim that national level endorsement of the reforms, compared to the United Nations endorsement, makes propagation and acceptance of the women’s rights reforms easier for the general public.
The scope of this article is related to the following SDG / SDGs.
Downloads
Metrics
References
Ahmad, N. 2010, Land Rights for Pakistani (Muslim) Women: Law and Policy, Policy Brief Series # 23, Sustainable Development Policy Institute, Islamabad.
Ali, S. S. 2013, ‘From ratification to implementation: the domestication of CEDAW’, in Hellum, P. A. and Aasen. H. S., Women's Human Rights: CEDAW in International, Regional and National Law, Cambridge University Press.
Anjum, G., Chilton, A., and Usman, Z. 2016, ‘United Nations Endorsement & Support for Human Rights: An Experiment on Women's Rights in Pakistan’, Coase-Sandor Working Paper Series in Law and Economics, no. 747.
Bhattacharya, S. 2014, ‘Status of Women in Pakistan’, Journal of the Research Society of Pakistan, vol. 51, no.1. pp. 179-211.
Bokhari, S. 2009, Good Practices in Legislation to Address Harmful Practices against Women in Pakistan, United Nation -Nation, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Bullock, W., Kosuke, I, and Jacob, N. S. 2011, ‘Statistical Analysis of Endorsement Experiments: Measuring Support for Militant Groups in Pakistan’, Political Analysis, vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 363-84.
Chilton, A. 2014, ‘The Influence of International Human Rights Agreements on Public Opinion: An Experimental Study’, Chicago Journal of International Law, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 110–137.
Conrad, C. R. and Ritter, E. H. 2013, ‘Treaties, Tenure, and Torture: The Conflicting Domestic Effects of International Law’, Journal of Politics, vol.75, no. 2, pp.397-409.
CEDAW 2013, ‘CEDAW Country Review: Concluding observations on the fourth periodic report of Pakistan adopted by the Committee at its fifty fourth session’, Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women, accessed 9 September 2017.
Freedom House 2015, ‘Freedom in the World Report 2015’, Discarding Democracy: Return to the Iron Fist, <https://freedomhouse.org/report/freedomworld/freedom-world-2015#.WcS0D8jhrIU> accessed 9 September 2017.
Freedom House 2017, ‘Freedom in the World Report 2017’, The Dual Threat to Global Democracy <https://freedomhouse.org/report/freedom-world/2017/pakistan> accessed 9 September 2017.
Hafner-Burton, E. M. 2013, Making Human Rights a Reality, Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey.
Hillebrecht, C. 2014, Domestic Politics and International Human Rights Tribunals: The Problem of Compliance, Cambridge University Press, New York, US.
Human Rights Watch Pakistan 2017, Pakistan Events of 2016, Human Rights Watch Pakistan, <https://www.hrw.org/world-report/2017/country-chapters/pakistan> viewed 7 March 2017.
Human Rights Watch Pakistan 2016, State of Human Rights in 2015, Women, Human Rights Commission of Pakistan –HRCP, Lahore, Pakistan, < http://hrcpweb.org/hrcpweb/hrcp-annual-report-2015/> accessed 6 April 2017.
Khan, R. 2009, Situational Analysis and Mapping of Women’s Human Rights in Pakistan.
Canadian International Development Agency (CIDA) Pakistan Programme,
<http://researchcollective.org/Documents/Final%20Report_on_Women.pdf> accessed on 31 March 2017.
Lupu, Y. 2013, ‘The Informative Power of Treaty Commitment: Using the Spatial Model to Address Selection Effects’, American Journal of Political Science, vol. 57, no. 4, pp. 912-925.
Lupu, Y. 2015, ‘Legislative Veto Players and the Effects of International Human Rights Agreements’, American Journal of Political Science, vol. 59, no. 3, pp. 578-594.
Management System International 2012, USAID Pakistan gender analysis & gender assessment of stabilization programming, Management System International, Washington D.C., US.
Ministry of Planning 2013, ‘Pakistan Millennium Development Goals Report, Planning Commission, Government of Pakistan, Islamabad, Pakistan.
Moheyuddin, G. 2005, Background, Assessment and Analysis of the Gender Issues in Pakistan, Munich Personal RePEc Archive -MPRA, Lahore, Pakistan.
Naz, D. A., Ibrahim, I. and Ahmad, W. 2012, ‘Socio-Cultural Impediments to Women Political Empowerment in Pakhtun Society’, Academic Research International, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 163-173.
Posner, E. 2014, The Twilight of International Human Rights Law, Oxford University Press, New York.
Shah, I. A., Aziz, A. and Ahmad, M. S. 2015, ‘Women Councillors for Women’s Empowerment in Pakistan’, Journal of International Women’s Studies, vol.16, pp. 203-219.
Simmons, B. A. 2009, Mobilizing for Human Rights: International Law in Domestic Politics, Cambridge University Press, New York, US.
Sustainable Development Policy Institute, 2008, Pakistan: Country Gender Profile, Japan International Cooperation Agency, Islamabad Pakistan.
Punjab Laws Online 2016, ‘The Punjab Protection of Women Against Violence Act 2016 - Act XVI of 2016’, Punjab Laws Online, <http://punjablaws.gov.pk/laws/2634.html> accessed on 31 March 2017.
UN Women Pakistan, 2016, ‘Women's Economic Participation & Empowerment in Pakistan -Status Report’, UN Women Pakistan, Islamabad, Pakistan.
Weiss, A. M. 2003 ‘Interpreting Islam and Women’s Rights: Implementing CEDAW in Pakistan’, International Sociology, vol. 18, no.3, pp. 581-601.
The World Bank 2016, ‘Women Business and the Law: Getting to Equal’, The World Bank, Washington, DC, <http://wbl.worldbank.org/~/media/WBG/WBL/Documents/Reports/2016/Women-Business-and-the-Law-2016.pdf> accessed 31 March 2017.
World Economic Forum 2016, Global Gender Gap Report, Geneva, Switzerland,
<http://reports.weforum.org/global-gender-gap-report-2016/rankings/> accessed on 5 April 2017.
Zia, M. and Butt, R. 2012, Pakistan: NGO Alternative Report on CEDAW, Aurat Foundation. Islamabad, Pakistan.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Gulnaz Anjum , Mudassar Aziz, Adam Chilton, Zahid Usman
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
